3D Vision Syndrome & 3D Movies
Do you or your children have problems seeing the 3D in 3D movies, video-games, and academic programs. Watch this video to learn more about this.
>
This public service announcement is brought to you courtesy of the College of Optometrists in Vision Development.
MainosMemos contains the latest research and information about eye and vision care of children, developmental disabilities, Traumatic/Acquired Brain Injury and other topics of interest to me (and hopefully you!).
Saturday, December 29, 2012
Friday, December 28, 2012
OMD Comment on "The Number of Placebo Controlled, Double Blind, Prospective, and Randomized Strabismus Surgery Outcome Clinical Trials: None!"
One of my ophthalmological
colleagues (Dr. EA Pennock) commented on my editorial, "
The Number of Placebo Controlled, Double Blind, Prospective, and Randomized
Strabismus Surgery Outcome Clinical Trials: None!".
This is a bit long, but should be
informative. I have not edited his commentary in anyway. Please read and note
my [comments]:
One can't ignore the studies
regarding anesthesia and the potential for future cognitive impairment. This is
a work in progress and the pediatric specialties are following closely. Like
anything in medicine (and you should be well-versed since you received an
"Excellence in Medicine" award) you have to consider the
risk-vs.-benefit ratio.
[While
the risk involved in strabismus surgery is small, you are right that it cannot
be ignored. Is the benefit always worth the risk when 1/3 of those who have had
the surgery need a second surgery and 1/3 of those a third surgery? Do not
misunderstand me here, I have recommended surgical intervention for those with
strabismus, but only after I have conducted vision therapy to improve all the
foundation visual skills. DM]
If I have a young patient with a 40
PD decompensated exotropia who is in danger of developing irreversible
amblyopia
[Research
clearly shows that this dated and worn out concept of irreversible amblyopia is
not only no longer true, it never was true. As an expert in this area I assume
you are aware of this. Please do a PubMed search for a review article by Dennis
Levi, OD, PhD. Actually, just click here for several of Dr.
Levi's studies in this area. Note that he and his colleagues conduct “perceptual
learning” which is really vision therapy by another name. DM]
and loss of stereoacuity, 30-40
minutes of anesthesia for strabismus surgery is not going to prevent him or her
from getting into Harvard.
[You
might be right if it only took one surgery...but what about the cumulative
effect of 3 surgeries? What about other surgeries the child may have for one
reason or another over their lifetimes? DM]
NB vision therapy and patching will
not touch a 40 XT]. People need to be properly educated, look at all of the
facts, and not over-react.
[I
agree, you should really look at all the facts. Start with amblyopia for one!
DM]
"The Number of Placebo Controlled, Double Blind, Prospective, and Randomized Strabismus Surgery Outcome Clinical Trials: None!" Not entirely false
"The Number of Placebo Controlled, Double Blind, Prospective, and Randomized Strabismus Surgery Outcome Clinical Trials: None!" Not entirely false
[Thanks
for acknowledging the truth present in my editorial, I really appreciate it!
[DM],
but there have been many published
outcome trials
[This
does not appear to be true according to Cochrane's Reviews (see below) where I
sought most of the information in my editorial. There are not only few clinical
trials but most according to Cochrane are of poor quality or show poor
outcomes. DM].
Search PubMed. As far as placebo-controlled and double-blinded--that's just ludicrous and not really feasible.
[Isn't
that interesting? This is the same thing optometrists said when you told us we
needed clinical trials when it came to vision therapy. Somehow we managed with
the many CITT studies. So are you admitting you cannot do "good"
clinical trials in the area of strabismus surgery? DM]
The patients will know whether they
had surgery. The blinded examiners will also be able to figure out who had
surgery and who did not. The only way to blind/mask it is to take one cohort
and put them under anesthesia, make an incision, and go through the motions
i.e. sham surgery. Another option would be to operate on a cohort of patients
without strabismus--to compare outcomes. I'm certain that both scenarios are
unethical and any IRB (institutional review board) would not be amused.
Speaking of which, I have yet to come across a well-designed and executed vision therapy study without multiple confounding variables. The CITT does not count, though it is legitimate
[I
am thrilled that you think this study is legitimate...but I'm puzzled why you
say it does not count? Does it not count because you say so or do you have some
science to back up your comment about this "legitimate" clinical
trial? DM].
Its results are often
inappropriately extrapolated for all vision therapy. The CITT addressed only a
specific problem, namely convergence insufficiency.
[The
few clinical trials concerning strabismus surgery are also inappropriately
extrapolated for all surgical interventions one can use with strabismus. There
are also multiple ways one can go about conducting the surgery, right? I have
been told by your colleagues that strabismus surgery is as much "art"
as it is "science". Is this true? DM]
It did not look at dyslexia
[Find
articles about reading and vision by clicking here. DM],
headaches
[Headaches are often associated
with uncorrected refractive errors (Headaches Associated With
Refractive Errors: Myth or Reality? , The Correlation Between Migraine
Headache and Refractive Errors) and binocular vision dysfunction (Is all Asthenopia the Same?
, Asthenopia in Schoolchildren,
Orthoptic and Ophthalmological Findings and Treatment) You should also be aware that one of the symptoms
eliminated after vision therapy is headaches as noted in the CITT study, right?
DM],
cortical blindness
[Are
you familiar of any of the research in the area of vision rehabilitation? I'm
giving a presentation during the Pediatric Cortical Visual Impairment
Conference this year at the Children's Hospital in Omaha, NE this April.
Although I was only going to discuss vision therapy for those with cortical
blindness in a limited fashion, I'm sure the other presenters will do so in
more detail. I hope to see you there. DM],
reading comprehension,
[Besides
the articles concerning vision and reading noted above, a colleague of mine
recently published, Association between reading speed,
cycloplegic refractive error, and oculomotor function in reading disabled
children versus controls, and found that ... there are
significant associations between reading speed, refractive error, and in
particular vergence facility. It appears sensible that students being
considered for reading specific IEP status should have a full eye
examination...in addition to a comprehensive binocular vision evaluation....
DM]
esotropia,
[Throwing
in everything except the kitchen sink is an old, tired argument methodology
that ophthalmology uses to confuse the issues. Shame on you for digging this
one up to support your statements about strabismus surgery. Dyslexia,
headaches, etc. are not relevant to this discussion at all. If
you stick to the point, you might make a better, more believable statement. DM]
and so forth.
[Here
is a listing of hundreds of articles concerning vision therapy. Happy
reading!
Summary 1
Completed in July, 2009, this paper presents over 350 abstracts from 77 journals.
Summary 2
Completed in October, 2010, this paper presents 35 additional abstracts.
Completed in July, 2009, this paper presents over 350 abstracts from 77 journals.
Summary 2
Completed in October, 2010, this paper presents 35 additional abstracts.
Maybe,
once you review these hundreds of articles, you might be changing your opinion
on at least some of your feelings regarding vision therapy. DM]
Moreover it only looked at convergence/orthoptic
exercises,
[You
should know that clinical trials tend to be narrowly focused. You do understand
how clinical trials are conducted, right? DM]
not syntonics,
[The
use of light for therapy is well founded in several areas of medical care.
Click here for more
information on syntonics. DM]
yoked prism,
[The
use of yoked prisms has been invaluable in the case of brain injury (Vision Disturbances Following Traumatic Brain Injury),
improving asthenopia (The use of yoked
base-up and base-in prism for
reducing eye strain at the computer .), and can improve
vision function and reduce symptoms. Click here.]
low powered reading
glasses,
[Although
not a direct comparison, whoever thought a sub-clinical dose of aspirin could
have an effect that reduces your chance of heart attack? This is an area where
we do need additional studies but take a look at Behavioral effects of low plus
lenses, and using low plus to reduce myopia
(Decrease in Rate of Myopia
Progression with a Contact Lens Designed to Reduce Relative Peripheral
Hyperopia: One-Year Results).
pinhole glasses,
[We agree on this
one. Most ODs and OMDs, would agree this is a scam. But both professions have
members that promote interventions that need to be carefully evaluated like
when the ophthalmologist, Dr. Bates says "palming" can slow down myopia
development. DM]
flashing lights,
[Not sure what
you mean by "flashing lights". DM]
and the myriad other exercises that often cost
patients thousands of dollars out-of-pocket.
[It's a good
thing you never charge for your services, right? You do charge every
time you repeat a strabismus surgery, don't you? Fees should not
be an issue here, but a discussion for another day. Once again you are reaching
beyond the topic to muddle the issues involved. DM]
Orthoptic exercises and surgery can
both have excellent results in the hands of a skilled therapist and surgeon,
respectively.
[Optometric
Vision Therapy and surgery can both have excellent results in the hands of a
skilled optometrist, surgeon, and therapist... no argument here! You do have to
be open to all avenues of therapy, however, and not closed minded and
prejudicial. DM]
I hope this cleared up some
misconceptions.
[I
hope I helped to clear up some of your misconceptions as well. DM]
EA Pennock, MD
Dear Dr. Pennock:
I do appreciate the time you took to
respond to my concerns regarding strabismus surgery (even the sarcasm). I
believe we both want what is best for our patients. I also believe that
we both want to see a great deal more science behind our treatment paradigms.
My concern is that your colleagues
seldom acknowledge the short comings of strabismus surgery, while bashing optometric
vision therapy without taking the time to review the current research in this
area.
My concern is that your colleagues
often demand of optometry a level of evidence not demanded of themselves.
My concern is when ophthalmology
bans optometrists from their meetings because of professional pettiness and a
meanness of spirit, our patients are the ones who suffer.
Several of my awesome colleagues
have addressed many of these issues as well. Please see:
I would also suggesting reading:
MDs Talk about Vision Therapy
MDs discuss Vision Therapy as an effective medical treatment.
MDs discuss Vision Therapy as an effective medical treatment.
Vision Therapy: Information for Health Care
and Other Allied Professionals
A joint organizational policy statement of the American Academy of Optometry and the American Optometric Association
A joint organizational policy statement of the American Academy of Optometry and the American Optometric Association
Clinical Management of Binocular Vision:
Heterophoric, Accommodative, and Eye Movement Disorders by Mitchell Scheiman and Bruce Wick
Foundations of Binocular Vision: A Clinical
Perspective by Scott Steinman, Barbara Steinman and Ralph Garzia
Anomalies Of Binocular Vision: Diagnosis And
Management, by Robert P.
Rutstein OD MS and Kent M. Daum OD MS PhD
Binocular Anomalies: Diagnosis and Vision
Therapy by John R. Griffin MOpt OD MSEd, J. David Grisham OD MS FAAO
You
should also see the comments and other presentations by Susan
Barry, PhD. Read Fixing My Gaze, read
her Psychology Today blog, and check out her YouTube channel as well.
I should also mention the American Optometric Association's
Clinical Guidelines ....
Care of Patient with Amblyopia, Care of the Patient with Strabismus: Esotropia and Exotropia
, Care of the Patient with Accommodative and Vergence Dysfunction , and Care of the Patient with Learning Related Vision Problems.
Finally, Cochrane had other reviews
of strabismus intervention used by OMDs that I might not have mentioned in the
editorial:
Cochrane's Reviews on Strabismus Treatment
......The one included study
in this review
compared surgery on one eye to surgery on both eyes for the basic type of X(T)
and found that surgery on one eye was more effective. There are many studies of
X(T) in the current literature but the methods used do not allow reliable
interpretation of the results. Furthermore there is a worrying lack of evidence
regarding the natural history of X(T) and poor validation of measures of
severity. There is a clear need for further randomised studies to provide more
reliable evidence for the management of this condition......
The review
did not find any randomised trials that compared treatment to another treatment
or to no treatment.
Let's not forget about the use of ....
...This review found four randomised
controlled trials that compared botulinum toxin to another treatment or to no
treatment. The results showed no prophylactic use for botulinum toxin in sixth
nerve palsy, poor effect in adult horizontal strabismus without binocular use
of the eyes, and no difference in response for retreatment of infantile
esotropia or acute onset esotropia. It was not possible to determine dose
effect because of the different types and doses of botulinum toxin used in each
trial. Complications from the use of
botulinum toxin (Botox™ or Dysport™) included transient ptosis and vertical
deviation and combined rates for these complications ranged from 24% to 55.54%.
This review identified a need for more
randomised controlled trials to provide further reliable evidence on the
effective use of botulinum toxin for the treatment of strabismus....
Please take a moment to study the many resources I have
provided.
I suppose that we could continue to argue any
number of points......
I would suggest, however, that we come together as
individuals and as learned professions. I suggest that we put aside our
political differences and territorial behaviors; stop the pettiness and work
together for the benefit of our patients, as equals.
I know optometry has been and is willing to do this. Can you say the same for ophthalmology? DM
Thursday, December 27, 2012
Ophthalmic manifestations of children with Down syndrome in Port Harcourt, Nigeria
Ophthalmic manifestations of children with Down syndrome in Port Harcourt, Nigeria
.....Refractive errors were prevalent ....., whereas the prevalence of ocular diseases was low when compared to age-matched control participants. This study highlights the need for ophthalmic care in children with DS. Routine eye care such as the use of spectacles when necessary is recommended for people with DS at all ages to improve their educational and social needs as well as overall quality of life.....
Comments: It did not appear as if they assessed accommodative function in their population. The incidence of focusing dysfunctions in those with Down Syndrome is so high that you should typically assume that a plus add is needed for near tasks. (See Woodhouse M. Maino D. Down Syndrome. In Taub M, Bartuccio M, Maino D. (Eds) VisualDiagnosis and Care of the Patient with Special Needs; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. New York, NY;2012:31-40. for a review of the vision problems associated with those who have Down Syndrome)
.....Refractive errors were prevalent ....., whereas the prevalence of ocular diseases was low when compared to age-matched control participants. This study highlights the need for ophthalmic care in children with DS. Routine eye care such as the use of spectacles when necessary is recommended for people with DS at all ages to improve their educational and social needs as well as overall quality of life.....
Comments: It did not appear as if they assessed accommodative function in their population. The incidence of focusing dysfunctions in those with Down Syndrome is so high that you should typically assume that a plus add is needed for near tasks. (See Woodhouse M. Maino D. Down Syndrome. In Taub M, Bartuccio M, Maino D. (Eds) VisualDiagnosis and Care of the Patient with Special Needs; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. New York, NY;2012:31-40. for a review of the vision problems associated with those who have Down Syndrome)
Wednesday, December 26, 2012
Prevalence of Amblyopia and Refractive Errors in an Unscreened Population of Children
Prevalence of Amblyopia and Refractive Errors in an Unscreened Population of Children
....Refractive errors ranged from 84.2% in children aged up to 2 years to 75.5% in those aged 10 to 12 years. Refractive error showed a myopic shift with age; myopia prevalence increased from 2.2% in those aged 6 to 7 years to 6.3% in those aged 10 to 12 years. Of the examined children, 77 (16.3%) had refractive errors, with visual loss; of these, 60 (78%) did not use corrections. The prevalence of amblyopia was 3.1%, and refractive error attributed to the amblyopia in 9 of 13 (69%) children.....
Comments: Children do not need to be screened. The outcomes of vision screening have been shown to be poor. Our children need full, comprehensive eye examinations at least once a year until high school. DM
....Refractive errors ranged from 84.2% in children aged up to 2 years to 75.5% in those aged 10 to 12 years. Refractive error showed a myopic shift with age; myopia prevalence increased from 2.2% in those aged 6 to 7 years to 6.3% in those aged 10 to 12 years. Of the examined children, 77 (16.3%) had refractive errors, with visual loss; of these, 60 (78%) did not use corrections. The prevalence of amblyopia was 3.1%, and refractive error attributed to the amblyopia in 9 of 13 (69%) children.....
Comments: Children do not need to be screened. The outcomes of vision screening have been shown to be poor. Our children need full, comprehensive eye examinations at least once a year until high school. DM
Tuesday, December 25, 2012
Monday, December 24, 2012
Sunday, December 23, 2012
The Effect of Sensory Uncertainty Due to Amblyopia (Lazy Eye) on the Planning and Execution of Visually-Guided 3D Reaching Movements
The Effect of Sensory Uncertainty Due to Amblyopia (Lazy Eye) on the Planning and Execution of Visually-Guided 3D Reaching Movements
Sensory uncertainty due to amblyopia leads to reduced precision of the motor plan. The ability to implement online corrections depends on the severity of the visual deficit, viewing condition, and the axis of the reaching movement. ...., patients with severe amblyopia were not able to use online control as effectively to amend the limb trajectory especially along the depth axis, which could be due to their abnormal stereopsis...
Comment: Full article available by clicking on the title above. DM
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)